2023 In the Rear View Mirror

Fond Farewell To 2023!

Last year is so last year. And don’t we just move on to the next thing and wipe our memory regardless of how awesome or gruesome it all was? Here’s one last look at lowlights and highlights of 2023 before we consign it to the historical dustbin.

The year started off with a whimper when the January 1 Resolution Ride had to be cancelled. It wouldn’t be the first time it was cancelled due to rain. But this time it was due to the effects of the New Year’s Eve atmospheric river that caused North Gate Road to collapse and closed all of Mt. Diablo State Park. Everyone else had the common sense to find something else to do. But Roger and I had to break in the new year with a ride. So we went for a ride out to Redwood Road only to discover…a huge section didn’t exist anymore again due to the storm. It still doesn’t exist today! It turned into a cyclocross day with plenty of walking, mud, and a long clean up afterwards.

The lowest of lowlights had to be David Sexton’s murder. On July 1 David was murdered—oh excuse me, he was a victim of ‘vehicular manslaughter’ since getting murdered by car drivers has its own lesser category—when he was hit in Richmond, CA while cycling to Napa to visit Gordon. At the time the police indicated they knew who did it. But no arrest has been made to date. David was much loved in the club and his loss is/was a hard one. Although a lot of Spokers have passed over the years, very few have been due to car drivers; the last one was Dennis Nix, who was a club secretary in the late 90’s, who was killed in 2015 by a hit-and-run driver in San Francisco.

The incredible rainfall in the first quarter of 2023 was the other lowlight. Although the prolific atmospheric rivers—33 altogether, I believe—finally ended the multi-year drought, it made cycling even more character building. Every single club ride in March was either cancelled or postponed. As was the case in 2014 a raft of roads popular and well-used by cyclists ended up being closed due to road failure or landslides. Many of them are still closed today, more than a year after the New Year’s Eve deluge that wiped out most of them. On the bright side, some eventually reopened although it took a long time. We’re still waiting for Mountain Charlie, Redwood Road, Wildcat, and Highway One.

All that rain as well as Covid resulted in the cancellation of the annual Kick Off Meeting. When the rains stopped and David got over Covid, the lack of enthusiasm by the board to host the KOM was evident. Ironically we eventually did have a ‘kick off meeting’ of sorts but it was at the very end of October. Which turned out to be a highlight because the end result of a long discussion about the future of the club was a slate of volunteers to step up and become the new board. Yahoo!

One of the highlights at least for me was the rerun in April of New Speedway Boogie, an oblique reference to riding up to Altamont Pass via Patterson Road. Patterson was closed due to a rain-induced landslide but was quickly reopened (compared to just about every other road closure, that is) in time for a club foray to catch the still luxurious green hills. And riding along the California Aqueduct is always a gas!

An intriguing highlight was the club going to the Golden State Warriors game on LBGT night. Yes, we’ve had Gay Games, Angel Island LGBT Sports Day, the Amgen Tour of California, the Coors Classic, and even club time trials around Lake Merced. But this was the first time the club went to a non-cycling spectator sports event. We sold out our allotment of 29 tickets! Spectator sports are the antithesis of cycling, which is all about moving your body. Nevertheless the event was an unexpected hit. Let’s do it again!

The final highlight of the year was the increasing popularity of the Short & Sassy rides, which goes to show that there are club members who would like short(er) rides, like less than 25 miles. A Short & Sassy South Bay ride drew six riders, which is great for a first-timer; the Short & Sassy Tib loop now draws almost as many riders as the Jersey Ride.

Happy Happy, Joy Joy

Yes, 700 glass ornaments!

The 2023 DSSF Holiday party was held at board secretary Stephen Shirreffs’ home in the SF Castro district on the evening of Sunday, December 17. Stephen is a crazy Christmas fan, and the house was filled with Christmas decor including his infamous tree with its nearly 700 glass ornaments. There was fine turnout for the event, with a total of twenty people attending. Four of the attendees were guests of the members.

Before the catering from La Mediterrannée arrived, Stephen took a moment to welcome everyone and give a history of his Christmas collection. It all started in 1989 when Stephen and two close personal friends held a party specifically for people living with AIDS. That tradition continued through 2017 and then took a break. So the DSSF party was the first time that a group of community people had “done” Christmas at Stephen’s place in six years.

We also took the moment to introduce board candidates. Prospective President Jeff Mishler outlined his plan to hold quarterly membership get-togethers primarily to discuss what folks want to do int the following quarter but also just to hang out. Prospective Vice President Stephen Shirreffs had said enough already. Prospective Treasurer Ginny Watson confirmed her happiness at joining the board. And Prospective Membership Coordinator and understudy to the Ride Coordinator, David Millard, expressed his interest in creating a wide array of rides including more gravel events. Prospective Webmaster Roger Sayre confirmed he will remain in his position.

The food from La Med was great … but next year order the large platter! … and the desserts were plentiful. Conversation, both in-depth and more fun-loving, went on for hours. It was a great way to end 2023 and to kick off 2024.

–Stephen Shirreffs

2024 Centuries: January-April [updated 4/14/24]

Here’s what we know so far for the first months of 2024. April is when the calendar really starts to get packed.


January

1 Monday. Resolution Ride/New Year’s Day Up Diablo. 38 miles. No fee. This isn’t a century but it’s the first “big” ride of the year and practically a club tradition. See the listing in the club calendar.


February


10 Saturday. Tour of Palm Springs. 102-, 85-, 56-, 34-, 25-, and 7-mile routes. $120-$35. Fees go up on Jan. 1. This is by today’s standards a huge ride—many thousands of cyclists. It’s a long drive south but hey, it’s Palm Springs! Registration is open.
18 Sunday. Velo Love Ride. 60 miles. No fee. This event had been put on by Chico Velo since at least the mid-Aughts if not earlier. It’s a much lower key event than their Wildflower, attracting only a couple hundred cyclists in a good year. It’s pleasantly flat and tours the scenic valley area around the Sutter Buttes providing an excellent early season metric. Unfortunately Chico Velo hasn’t been able to find a member willing to organize this long held ride. But Different Spokes is going to go up there to ride it anyway as long as it doesn’t rain. See the listing in the club calendar. If you’re unfamiliar with the Velo Love Ride, you can read about it here, here, and here. [POSTPONED TO MARCH 3]
24 Saturday. Pedaling Paths to Independence. 65- and 25-mile routes. $55 and $45. This benefit for the Community Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired is their annual fundraising ride out of Linden, which is just east of Stockton. It’s a small event of about 250-300 riders. It tours the rolling ag land south and east of the town. If you’re unfamiliar with this ride, you can read more about it here. Registration is open.
24 Saturday. Death Valley Century. 100-, 62- and 55-mile routes. $165. Limited to 300 cyclists. Registration is open. [1/15/24: 180 slots still open.]

March


2 Saturday. Solvang Century. 101-, 68-, and 52-mile routes. $189-$159. Limit of 1,000 riders. Registration opens December 31 is open. No day-of-event registration
3 Sunday. Velo Love Ride. 60 miles. No fee. This event had been put on by Chico Velo since at least the mid-Aughts if not earlier. It’s a much lower key event than their Wildflower, attracting only a couple hundred cyclists in a good year. It’s pleasantly flat and tours the scenic valley area around the Sutter Buttes providing an excellent early season metric. Unfortunately Chico Velo hasn’t been able to find a member willing to organize this long held ride. But Different Spokes is going to go up there to ride it anyway as long as it doesn’t rain. See the listing in the club calendar. If you’re unfamiliar with the Velo Love Ride, you can read about it here, here, and here. [POSTPONED]
17 Sunday. Ride & Walk4Art. 70-, 45-, and 30-mile routes. $105-$45. Limit of 300 riders. The Calaveras County Arts Council is putting on a cycling & walking & art show fundraiser for arts education in the Calaveras county public schools. Loops out of Valley Springs, CA (20 miles east of Linden) by the three big reservoirs. Registration is open.
April


13 Saturday. Cinderella Classic & Challenge. 93-, 63-, and 40-mile routes. $80-$55. Limit of 1,000 riders; women/girls only. The Classic starts at Las Positas College near Livermore and traverses a big loop through Danville, Dublin, and Pleasanton. Registration opens January 1 is open.
13 Saturday. Tierra Bella Century. 100-, 77-, 55-, and 33-mile routes. $70-$50. Limit of 1,200. Starts in Gilroy and takes in the climbs and reservoirs in Santa Clara Valley. New routes this year. Registration opens January 1 is open.
13 Saturday. Levi’s Gran Fondo. 139-, 120-, 81-, 63-, 40-, and 22-mile routes. $295-$100. Registration is open.
13 Saturday. Bike Around the Buttes. $70-$45. 100-, 70-, 40-, and 20-mile routes. Yuba-Sutter Lions Club fundraiser for diabetes and sight. Registration is open.
18-21 Thursday through Sunday. Sea Otter Classic. 85- and 50- mile road routes, 21-mile MTB route. $130. Registration is open.
20 Saturday. SLO Wildflower. 80-, 52- and 30-mile routes. $110. Limit of 1,000. This year the 80-mile route returns with some hope of catching wildflowers. In 2022 the club went down to do this ride and had a great time. Registration opens Dec. 31 is open. Registration is now closed.
21 Sunday. Primavera Century. 100-, 85-, 63-, and 25-mile routes. $110-$40. Starting in Fremont the 100-mile route reverses direction this year and heads out Niles Canyon to Palomares before heading out to Altamont Pass and then back around Calaveras Reservoir before returning to Fremont. Registration is open.
27 Saturday. Devil Mountain Double. 205- and 195-mile routes. $140. Details to come later. the 205-mile route has 20,639 feet of vertical; the 195-mile route ‘only’ 17,639 feet by removing Mt. Diablo. Climb Diablo, Morgan Territory, Altamont Pass, the back side of Hamilton, Calaveras, and Palomares. Registration is open.
27 Saturday. Jane Fondo. 24-, 38-, and 770-mile routes. $90-$150 or more. Marin County Bicycle Coalition fundraiser with routes in Marin starting out of Olema. Women only.
28 Sunday. Chico Wildflower. 125-, 100-, 65-, 60-, 30-, and 12-mile routes. $105-$75. This used to be the ‘must do’ club ride qua getaway weekend. Terrific riding despite the incineration of Paradise five years ago during the Camp Fire. Registration is open.

It Was 45 Years Ago Today

A small group of nine Spokers took the tour down to Colma to visit the gravesites of SF Mayor George Moscone and celebrated SF gay pioneer Jose Sarria before returning to the SF Columbarium to view the memorial niche for Supervisor Harvey Milk. Moscone and Milk were assassinated by disgruntled, ex-Supervisor Dan White on November 27, 1978 in City Hall after he was able to sneak by the metal detectors because he was an ex-cop. That day was burned in the memories of so many San Franciscans, and here it was 45 years later that we recalled it.

Although a bit chilly the sun was mostly out and we had a fabulous ride down the Great Highway eyeballing the large ten-foot waves pounding Ocean Beach. The SF Fire Dept. was deployed in case someone was carried away by a sneaker wave. After wending through Daly City’s Westlake Shopping Center we entered Colma, basically a huge underground condo development for the deceased; there are more dead people in Colma than the living.

Jose Sarria is buried in Woodlawn Memorial Park, which necessitates getting off Hillside Boulevard, Colma’s main drag. Up a steep hill near the top of Woodlawn there is his grave just in front of the Emperor Norton’s. Sarria’s drag persona, the Widow Norton, took the joke to another level when he found out the gravesite in front of the notorious Emperor Norton was available. Sarria’s site is surrounded by small metal plaques of deceased members of the Imperial Court, which he founded, and on his headstone is the memorable, “United We Stand But Divided They Catch Us One By One”

Then it was off to Holy Cross to visit Moscone. In contrast to the innumerable majestic (or gaudy) tombstones thronging the cemetery, Moscone’s is a simple plaque in the ground with the heart rending inscription in the bottom, “We Love You, Dad.” He took two bullets to the head thanks to Dan White. Harvey got five, two of them to the head. An overdone execution–but what do you expect from a mediocre cop? The jury deemed it just “manslaughter.”

The good weather and mostly sunny skies brought out a lot of other people visiting their family members and friends interred in Holy Cross. And they were warmly greeted by the honking Canadian geese who lurked everywhere in search of food…like tasty flowers.

We headed back to SF. Until then the traffic was light but now Westlake Shopping Center and then Lake Merced Blvd. was packed with cars, undoubtedly filled with folks exercising their shopping muscles at Stonestown. We headed back to GG Park and up Arguello to the little-known and hidden Columbarium. Harvey’s cremains aren’t actually in the Columbarium but a memorial niche has been the closest thing we have to a gravesite. Afterwards riders scattered except for Jordan, Karry, Roger, and me. We went to the nearby Arguello Market and had lunch remininscing about a time two generations ago.

Jose, Harvey, and George—Thanks for the good fight. We remember.
¡Presente!

Becoming a Ride Leader

I’ve pondered why more members are not leading rides. My own trajectory to leading rides was slow. I joined the club and—if my recollection is accurate—I didn’t attend a club ride until maybe a year later. Part of it was time: I was in graduate school and working part time. I was also mainly into running at that point but did lots of errands in SF on my bike. But I kept getting running injuries and decided I had to get back to cycling. I can’t recall if I attended one of the monthly club meetings or a ride first. On one of my early club rides I met Ron Decamp, a member who lived in the South Bay. We talked about riding on the Midpeninsula and eventually we agreed to colead a ride since the club didn’t ride there often enough despite the area’s marvelous cycling routes. Neither of us had led a club ride before. After that first time coleading, it was easy to lead on my own even though I still didn’t lead often.

Making friends in the club led to doing more club rides and often we just got together to ride when there wasn’t a club ride (or a club ride that appealed to us). We also had the now vanished Decide & Ride: show up at McLaren Lodge on any Sunday at 10 am. Whoever came would decide where to ride. There almost always was a small group who showed up when there wasn’t another club ride. That all led to leading more rides. But I rarely led more than maybe three rides per year—usually less—unlike in recent years when I’ve led or co-led a couple per month.

We used to have monthly club meetings back then and I think they helped draw out some ride leaders. Those meetings always involved exhortations from the ride coordinator as well as a preview of next month’s rides and the slots in the calendar that needed filling. (We printed a monthly newsletter, the ChainLetter, which included the ride calendar for the month. So rides had to be gathered at least three weeks in advance.) At the meeting ride hosts would talk about their rides to encourage participation and informally members would talk about where they were interested in riding and get encouragement from others to lead a ride. Everyone was gently encouraged to lead a ride they liked and I think hesitant members got enough positive feedback at those meetings to step up and lead their ride.

Of course we no longer have regular meetings and most of our communication has shifted from in-person to the Internet. This I think makes it harder to foster ride hosting. Personal contact makes a difference in persuading members that they can lead a ride, and that other members will indeed show up. The most commonly mentioned reason not to lead a ride is “but what if no one else shows up?” and that fear was assuaged by people telling the potential ride leader’s face that they were interested in that ride.

Believe me I’ve posted rides and been the only person to show up. But I’ve made it a point to post rides that I wanted to do. So if no one else showed up, I still got to do a ride I wanted to do. It was hardly a burden if I was going to ride anyway.

I’m not sure why there is reticence today to lead a ride. There are the usual reasons: not wanting to be “obligated” to do it (FOMO??); being shy (as if we were going to judge you based on your ride); and “I wouldn’t know where to lead a ride”. At some level it is a matter of personality: some people are afraid of being in a leadership role. Is that due to lack of self-confidence? Chris Thomas is one of the shiest people I know and yet he went from volunteering to lead a ride in Fresno, where he lived at the time, to leading a zillion AIDS Lifecycle training rides and then Double Bay Double training rides. (Incidentally when he did list that ride, we drove all the way to Fresno to do his ride and support him as did a few other Bay Area members.)

But I don’t believe ride leaders are born even if personality makes it easier for some people to make the move. Ride leaders are made and we don’t yet have a proven recipe for developing ride leaders despite 40 years of existence. We are indeed slow learners! One thing I do know is that I cannot recall a single case of someone new to the club showing up and then leading a ride very shortly thereafter. Someone new to the club comes on a ride, checks us out, and decides whether to come a second time. If they like the experience, then maybe they come on a few rides and make friends in the club. Only at that point do they offer to lead a ride. That rarely happens nowadays. Coleading a ride with another member makes it easier to step up. Also, having a coleader means that someone else is guaranteed to show up!

I also suspect that we rely too much on self-volunteering rather than directly asking, “Hey, would you be interested in leading a ride for the club?” We replicate what we know and in my case no one needed to ask me to lead a ride. I haven’t started cold calling members but maybe that’s the next ride coordinator’s decision.

Stepping up to leading a ride is surely a sign of some emotional investment in the club. When you make friends in the club, leading a ride becomes much easier. We certainly don’t expect every member to lead rides (although that would be wonderful!) But at our membership level we should have about 15-20 active ride leaders in any year and we’re below that.

Ride Recap: November Jersey, S&S Rides

[Ed. David Goldsmith and Jeff Mishler recap this past weekends club rides.]

David: An unexpectedly beautiful day and not unexpectedly a nice group as usual. Short and Sassy had four riders: me, Ginny, Laura, and a new rider, Chris. It was Chris’ first-ever group ride although he told me he had done eight or nine 20-30 miles rides recently so he felt like he would be able to deal with the distance.

I had a mechanical problem (brakes) upon arrival and needed some time with my bike while Ginny and Laura welcomed Chris. Wait for it … I managed to fix the problem on my own without having to go into Mike’s for help! Laura rode with us on her non-ebike road bike, the first time she had been on it for over a year. We left Mike’s around ten. Riding out, I stayed with Chris for a while to make sure his pace was going to work for the group that was riding and to orient him to group riding since it was his first time.

The Slow and Sassy riders connected with the Jersey Ride coming from San Francisco at our usual meeting point, the stop sign at the base of Camino Alto. After that we mostly stayed together although we got a little spread out on Paradise as usually happens because we have riders with varying paces. Roger S. had a little incident when his jacket started slipping out of his jersey pocket and got caught up in his rear wheel. Fortunately it just slowed him down and he was able to stop safely and untangle the mess. It was the end of the jacket though as one of the sleeves was pretty much ripped to shreds.

After the usual nice lunch at Woodlands, we made it back to Sausalito arriving back at Mike’s a little before 2. Chris’s parting words were “So, when’s the next one of these?” Nice to hear.

Jeff: To add to David’s comments the Jersey Ride had five leaving from SF—Roger S, Jeff P, Stephen, Maurizio, and me. The sections to and from Sausalito were mainly notable just by how fog and wind-free they were! From the Presidio we were able to see Bolinas well past the Headlands. 

When approaching the GGB, there is a small wooden bridge that leads to the gravel path. On that small bridge there is a new “security bollard”. It is abnormally low and large, like 18″ in width, bright orange, and seemingly under construction still. No idea what they’re trying to do with it, but watch out.

Ed. Next Jersey Ride and Short & Sassy Tib Loop will be Saturday December 9.

Don’t You Have People For That?

“How about I ream out that bottom bracket?”

David Goldsmith asked me that question years ago. I can’t remember exactly what it was in reference to but I do recall being amused and of a lightbulb popping up in my head about the cultural zeitgeist behind that question. There was a time when people did most everything around the house whether it was house cleaning, fixing the car, installing a new garbage disposal, gardening, or wiring a new outlet. It was just understood that we could do that and we only hired someone to take on tasks that required a professional such a lawyer, doctor, architect, etc.

Certainly part of the ethos of 1950s and 1960s was that boys learned from their fathers (or that shop class in high school) and girls learned from their mothers (or the home ec class in high school) how to do these kinds of things. Boys grew up learning how to do household repairs and to wield as many tools as their dads could afford to store in the garage workshop. Is that still true today? Perhaps less so. Today boys’ spare time is devoted to a myriad of after school activities instead of helping their dads with household repairs.

When I was in high school I hung out with a small group of budding bike fanatics and yet none us had anything remotely special for a bike. (I had a Schwinn Continental with steel rims and an Ashtabula crank!) One day John suggested we take our bikes apart, clean them, and put them back together. On his backyard patio no less. Before that I had only a vague idea of how bikes worked and were put together. John knew only a little bit more then I did. That experience was revelatory if hard and frustrating. It was a bit over our heads but we managed to take apart our bikes right down to the ball bearings including the freewheel and reassemble everything. It took all day. And yes, we did have a couple of parts left over. But by that point we were exhausted and our bikes appeared to work fine anyway. The end result was that I was never intimidated by working on a bike again.

Until now. Taking apart a downtube indexed shifter is as “contemporary” a repair as I feel confident to do on new technology. Shimano shifters—thank god!—are not intended to be disassembled and if they fail you just replace them. But other technologies give me the heebie-jeebies: suspension forks, hydraulic brakes, and electronic shifting systems. I have managed to learn to use a torque wrench and live with tubeless tires. I know that at some point I’m going to bite the bullet and learn how to do those repairs, make a shitload of newby mistakes, but eventually get competent enough to handle my own repairs and maintenance. But I am avoiding it as long as possible, ie. until something irretrievably breaks.

But beyond the higher technological skillset necessary to take care of these repairs—it really isn’t that much more complicated than before—there has just a cultural shift in bike repair: find people to do ALL your maintenance and just throw money at your problems. The inability whether it’s due to lack of time, lack of interest, or just ennui is much more acceptable these days. We all understand when someone hires someone or uses a convenience instead of doing the work themselves. Instead of preparing a meal we go out to eat. It’s easier especially when you’re tired after a day’s work. Fix your bike? You’d rather be riding it instead of wasting your precious Me time wrestling with a recalcitrant tire. How many of us still clean their home instead of hiring a cleaning service? Dry cleaning? Nowadays we can send out all our clothing for washing and it’ll be returned nicely ironed and folded too. There is no shame anymore in not knowing how to do things ourselves; we just understand that we hire others to do things for us. It’s just more things than before.

When I was a teenager I took car repair classes at the local community college. I am probably the last person with any kind of abiding interest in cars. I’ll drive anything as long as it’s cheap and can get me from point A to point B and is reliable. But I thought I should know something about our car and feel less marooned when it came to an unexpected failure. Working hands-on on my car was just as revelatory as working on my Schwinn. After those classes I didn’t work on my car very much but I certainly felt competent and could talk to my mechanic. As with bikes, auto technology has quickly advanced and now nothing can be done to a car engine without a diagnostic computer to tune it. So I’m back to square one again: ignorant and completely in the hands of auto mechanics.

We are embodied beings so knowledge we acquire through our bodies and not just from reading or watching YouTube videos can take us to another level. The experience of using our hands especially to learn about the world is valuable knowledge. How much torque do I need to apply to snug up a bolt? What does that feel like? How much to turn that adjustment screw to quiet the rattle in the rear derailleur? You learn that through your body. It is felt knowledge. Buddhists say that you don’t give a starving person a menu, you give them food. That is to say, talking about enlightenment is worthless; one has to experience it directly to know. So it is with bike repair. To understand your bike intimately you have to work on it. Yes, mechanics can make your problem vanish. But will you be “fed”?

Sucked Any Good Wheel Lately?

Has it felt like there haven’t been many club rides recently? Maybe you hadn’t noticed because you’re not riding much. Or, at least you’re not riding much with Different Spokes. And we know one begets the other: fewer rides results in less interest and expectations, which results in even fewer rides. This has been a bad year for the club partly due to the record rainfall for the first four months of 2023. But we didn’t rebound once the weather improved for riding. As some of you know this has also been a bad year for illness, injuries, and accidents and not just among the usual ride leaders. Both David Goldsmith and I have been derailed this year from leading many rides (although David is doing a lot better than I!) Whether it’s a home remodel, Covid, accidents, or one’s aging body letting one down, life has a way of interfering with cycling.

There is also usually a lull in rides before AIDS Lifecycle as some members focus on that event. But honestly we don’t support AIDS Lifecycle anymore as we used to by offering training rides. Lifecycle has its own robust training ride schedule and doesn’t need any help from us. (We’ve outlived our usefulness to it, it seems.) This year the rebound post-Lifecycle didn’t happen for some reason and we had very few rides offered.

What has been revealed in glaring clarity is that there is little interest in leading rides in the club right now. The Jersey Ride, which by the way has been the most popular and well-attended ride in our history, does not have throngs of members eager to lead it. It’s usually a board member or an ex-board member who finally relents and volunteers to lead it after much exhortation and prodding from Yours Truly. Do I like beating the bushes to find a JR ride host? No, it’s a minor chore but the fact that I have to do it rather than having a member spontaneously step up before I even ask, saying, “Hey, I’d like to lead next month’s JR? May I do that?” reveals the lack of volunteerism and ennui we have now. I find JR hosts and often with a response such as, “Oh, I’ll do it but only if no one else does.” Apparently leading the JR is also viewed as a minor chore by others. And perhaps that says something about the JR itself. Maybe it was a good horse in its youth but it’s outlived its time and should now be put out to pasture. If no one is jumping for joy to lead the JR, then perhaps we should just stop offering it in its present form. If you like the JR, then maybe you should do something about preserving it by leading it once in a while because frankly that burden has fallen on an extremely small number of members who likely would prefer to be riding somewhere else. Or maybe the JR needs to get away from the Tib loop and go elsewhere as a breath of fresh air?

The shitshow on the GG Bridge in the afternoon doesn’t help. It’s one of the reasons David now leads the Short & Sassy Tib loop since it starts and ends in Marin and he doesn’t have to risk life and limb on the Bridge. It’s also the reason Roger and I no longer lead it: after two JRs where we were nearly hit we will no longer ride southbound on the Bridge in the afternoon and prefer to lead the much safer East Bay Tiburon loop. Maybe you feel the same way and that’s why you don’t want to lead or participate in the JR? But your silence tells us little. Speak up and let us know.

One could argue that the resistance to leading the JR is idiosyncratic. But we’ve had a glorious summer almost devoid of oppressive heat waves and wildfire smoke and yet we’ve had less than half the number of rides we usually have had. For at least a couple of years we’ve averaged about one club ride per week throughout the year. This year it’s going to be much less than half that.

This isn’t to say that no one volunteers to lead rides. There are still a few members who without urging will occasionally post rides from their repertoire. But the ride leader cohort has been dwindling and not replenished at the same rate, so it’s fragile right now. When two or three of the main leaders can’t lead rides, the calendar suffers greatly. This might be tolerable for a month or two. But at some point I would expect members to think, “Gee, there haven’t been many rides. I’ll lead one next month.” This was actually my thought process when I volunteered to be the ride coordinator back in 2016. The ride calendar was dismal and we hadn’t had a ride coordinator in over two years. So at first I led more rides and then in the vain hope of having a multiplier effect I volunteered to be the club ride coordinator. It clearly had some effect since the numbers went up. But now rides are dwindling again and frankly I’m not sure what to do to rectify it. Perhaps there is no rectification needed and this is just part of the natural up and down cycle of the club.

Over the past five years the board has worked to structurally make it easier to lead rides. The club RideWithGPS account has a curated library of rides throughout the greater Bay Area including a Most Popular selection for each county. This should make it easier to peruse and find interesting rides without having to generate a cue sheet, map, or GPS file for participants. Some rides even have ride notes and ride history information in their files. Posting rides on the ride calendar is easy through the “post a ride” link and usually are up in less than a day or even faster through the QuickEvents method. There is a dedicated ride leader forum for those who lead rides to discuss and problem solve issues pertaining to ride leading.

I suspect the common reaction amongst you to the dearth of rides is at best very mild disappointment. It’s so easy to get on a bike and ride by oneself; you don’t have to do any work to arrange or coordinate it, you can leave at whatever time you want, and you can do whatever ride you want including changing your mind midride. Leading a ride does involve a time commitment at an appointed date and time. Why bother when it’s easy just to text a friend or two and see if they want to join your personal ride than it is to organize a ride for the club? I would like to say that it’s easy to find another ride at any of the non-LGBTQ clubs. But that is becoming harder too. Larger clubs such as the Valley Spokesmen and even Grizzly Peak Cyclists have diminishing ride calendars and they periodically plea for more ride leaders. So it’s not just us.

The idea behind leading a club ride isn’t to put members through an ordeal. If that is your reaction, then don’t do it. In all the years I’ve ridden with Different Spokes leading rides has been about wanting to get together with your friends to ride. If that’s not enough to get you warm and fuzzy about leading a club ride, then don’t do it. You should feel eager to lead a club ride, jazzed about it and not repulsed. If that is not the reaction of most of the members, then it’s time to shutter the club. Don’t lead a club ride if you don’t feel like it. On the other hand, as a member you should feel that giving back to the club is something you want to do. Those who take should also give. Or have we forgotten the moral of the childhood story of Stone Soup?

At this juncture of the club, the real question is why members don’t want to lead rides because not wanting to do the most vital function of our club means there is something radically wrong. The culture of the club should be one of excitement, fun, and sharing. And sharing means sharing the “work” of making the club a continuing, viable organization. If there aren’t enough members who want to contribute to the club, then we will wither and vanish just as Different Spokes Seattle, Rainbow Cyclists in San Diego, and River City Cyclists in Sacramento all did.

Well, if you don’t care, then you don’t care. But I know some of you do and now is the time to act rather than sit back in the in the draft and let others plow into the wind. You know what cyclists say about wheelsuckers, don’t you? I’m flicking my elbow at you. Yes, you.

Right On

The SF Board of Supevisors voted unanimously at their board meeting on October 3 to recommend instituting no right turn on red (NTOR) throughout the City. This resolution means the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), which oversees transportation regulation, then has 120 days to decide whether or how to implement this into law. Although the Board resolution is the widening of NTOR from just the Tenderloin, which has had NTOR for some years, SFMTA may choose to extend NTOR in a limited way rather than completely throughout the City. Exactly who is affected by NTOR if implemented—all motor vehicles, buses, taxis, bicycles—is also SFMTA’s purview.

Other than in a few places in the US such as New York City, Washington DC, and Cambridge, MA, NTOR is uncommon although it is very common elsewhere in the world. Turning on red actually started—or at least gained wide traction—here in California many years ago and eventually became a standard practice in the US. We take it for granted that making a right turn at a red light is common sense. Why waste gasoline and time idling at the light when a right turn affects no one else and may help to speed up traffic and reduce congestion? When I’ve cycled in countries such as Japan where NTOR has been and is the law, it feels absurd to sit at a light and not turn (left in Japan) when there is no traffic. But I know this is because I’m not used to it.

I am a traffic law martinet. There are very few traffic laws I ignore when cycling; for example, I’m one of the rare cyclists to stop at stop signs. I’ve even been run into from behind by cyclists who just presumed that I would ignore the stop sign and ride through it. But I can rightfully be called a scofflaw for rolling through stop signs and even red lights when I am turning right here at home.

The reason why the Supes voted for NTOR is because it’s more dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists. Often motorists make that right turn when it is NOT safe hitting pedestrians in the crosswalk or right-hooking cyclists. This is especially dangerous when it’s a truck making the turn.

When this is finally codified in city law there is sure to be an adjustment period since everyone is habituated to turning right on red and will need to be informed constantly not to do so anymore. Will there be signs at every lighted intersection? That’s a lot of signs to install! Furthermore we’ll all have to remember that SF is now the exception and as soon as we cross from Oakland, Marin, or San Mateo into the City, we will have to drive differently. Will there actually be traffic enforcement or will this be just another instance of legal virtue signaling? [pun intended]

Traffic statistics show pretty conclusively that NTOR leads to a reduction in pedestrian and cyclist deaths and injuries. So it’s probably a good thing although how that’s going to play out with SF being essentially an ‘island’ of NTOR is yet to be seen. There are always unforeseen consequences and how people react to this new law is not entirely predictable. A combination of ped/cyclists presuming drivers will respect NTOR and drivers forgetting about NTOR in SF is going to be a heady brew.

Of course completely ignored in the public discussion is cyclists’ behavior to NTOR. Although cyclists are not motor vehicles we are considered as having the rights and responsibilities of motor vehicles under the vehicle code. Unless the SFMTA makes an explicit exception for cyclists, we are going to have to stop and wait at red lights to make a right turn just like motorists.

The two governing principles cyclists in SF abide by are: (1) will I get killed? and (2) can I get away with it? Lights and stop signs are given lip service only to be ignored at the next intersection. As long as they can get away with it. I don’t expect that to change with NTOR. If there is no exception for cyclists, I predict we are going to see the vast majority of cyclists ignore this new law except when a cop is present.

There is an elementary school that I ride by very often and it has a traffic light directly in front of it. It’s a four-way cross, ie. all traffic stops to let pedestrians (= children) cross in any direction. The city installed NTOR warning signs. Apparently the four-way stop lights are not sufficient and crossing guards staff the intersection during school opening and closing. One of them was hit and killed by a motorist a couple of years ago while he was protecting a child crossing the street.

The stop lights at this school are activated by pushing any of the beg buttons. To stay on the bike route you have to turn right at the light, and Roger and I are the only cyclists who respect that sign and stop even when there is ‘no good reason’ to do so. Every cyclist we have ever encountered there has ignored that sign. (We’ve seen an occasional motorist also drive through!) So I don’t expect cyclists are going to respect any new law either.

Cyclists are gonna do what cyclists gonna do. So whether there is an exception made is hardly relevant to actual behavior. Given that California cyclists have been advocating for stop-as-yield (which is how stop signs are treated by cyclists in real life anyway), it’s laughable to expect cyclists to stop and wait at red lights before turning.

Just be prepared for some slight chaos and maybe some motorist blowback as well.

Of more relevance to the club is: will ride leaders respect this law on club rides? It’s really bad form for members to skirt the law on official club rides. That’s why official rides involving trail poaching, trespassing, ignoring road closure signs, and yes, running lights or stop signs is not officially sanctioned. What you do in your private life is one thing but what you do on club rides is another. And club liability insurance? Of what help will it be when the facts reveal that a ride leader ignored NTOR and a participant then followed and was struck by a car? I don’t want to see that happen.

But this is America and we all know that traffic laws don’t apply to us when there aren’t cops around.

Ride Recap: September Jersey Ride

Word has it that this month’s JR and its twin sister, the Short & Sassy Tib loop, was a fabulous time. Instead of scorching heat or gloomy fog, nine Spokers were entertained by a delightfully beautiful and sunny day. Since it was Ginny’s birthday, Jeff brought out a cake from Woodlands Market in celebration. Bike, sun, pleasant company, cake—what’s not to like?!

You too could be part of the party! Next month’s JR takes place on Saturday October 14. And don’t forget to wear your club jersey!